Replacing Mathematics
If someone produced a truly more advanced mathematics, it wouldn't necessarily look like "more of the same" (e.g., just bigger numbers or
more complex formulas). Instead, it would likely involve fundamental shifts in how we define and relate mathematical objects - it would
change the rules of the game.
Here are a few ways such an advanced mathematics might look, based on current challenges and theoretical directions in the field:
New Foundational Axioms (A Change in Logic)
Our current mathematics is largely built upon set theory and classical logic (where a statement is either True or False). An advanced
mathematics could revolutionize the foundations:
Beyond True/False: It might consistently use non-classical logic, such as Intuitionistic Logic (where something must be constructively proven true, not just not-false) or Fuzzy Logic (where truth is a continuous spectrum between 0 and 1), or Quantum Logic.
Axioms for Physics:
It might introduce a new set of axioms that are inherently better suited to describing the physical universe, potentially unifying general relativity and quantum mechanics. Currently, mathematics is a tool applied to physics; an advanced mathematics might be one that is inherently a physics theory.
Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT):
A developing field, HoTT, views mathematical objects not as points in a set, but as "spaces" or "types." Equality is not a binary choice but a continuous path between two objects. This shifts the focus from static objects to relationships and transformations. Advanced math might be built entirely on this dynamic, topological foundation.
Higher-Dimensional and Categorical Structures
Current advanced math uses categories (collections of objects and the structure-preserving maps between them) to unify different fields. A
more advanced mathematics would operate on categories of categories, and so on.
Categories:
This mathematics would deal with N-categories, where N is much higher than 1. This framework allows for the study of complex
relationships between structures that are impossible to capture with simple sets or single categories. For example, a structure could be
related to another structure in multiple ways, and those ways could themselves be related.
Topological QFT and String Theory:
The language would likely be extremely sophisticated, allowing mathematicians to fully formalize structures that currently exist only as hypotheses in physics, like the high-dimensional geometry of String Theory or the complex algebraic structures found in Topological Quantum Field Theory (TQFT).
Built for Complexity and Computation
Our current math often struggles to handle truly massive, complex systems like climate models or biological networks. Advanced math
might provide inherent tools for this.
Computational Irreducibility:
It could provide a framework to effectively deal with systems that are computationally irreducible
(where the only way to find out what happens is to run the simulation). This might involve new, non-standard approaches to
defining limits, continuity, or probability.
The Structure of Emergence:
The mathematics might be capable of modeling emergence - how simple rules lead to complex, unpredictable
macroscopic behavior. It could provide new, explicit relationships between micro-scale laws and macro-scale phenomena like consciousness
or turbulence.
In short, a truly advanced mathematics might look like:
A system where geometry, algebra, and logic are fundamentally unified under a new set of axioms, allowing for the precise description of
transformation, relationship, and complexity in ways we currently cannot conceive.
It would likely be highly abstract, focusing on structure and relationship rather than numbers and calculation, and its language
would be practically unrecognizable to even most modern mathematicians.
Disclaimer: This is not intended as professional advice. It's for informational purposes only.
Content written and posted by Ken Abbott abbottsystems@gmail.com
Like this post? Please share it by clicking one of the share buttons below!